Ezra Pound: could that be a laptop he’s poring over?
Okay, it’s a foggy autumn morning. It’s not time for brunch yet. You’re sitting there in your trackies wondering what it’s all about Alfie, whiling away reading blogs, thinking, “what the hell is a blog, anyway, and why am I wasting my Sunday morning reading them?” You’re thinking, “ten years ago they didn’t even exist, we used to read book for chrissakes, written by real writers who had something to say! For feck’s sake!”
I know the feeling. But all is not lost, because – like print before it – blogging is something that people can and will do good things with, despite the scurvy millions who are debasing it as a form before it’s even had the chance to become one. And many of those “real” writers you are pining for, in your reverie about the old days, and books, would probably have had Blogger accounts quicker than you can say “think of a password.”
Almost exactly two years ago, on the Sunday morning of October 29 2006, I sat here at the Baroque iMac wondering who, among these writers we all mourn the reading of, would have been among those early bloggers? We all know why people start a blog. These impulses are part of human nature and existed even in the eighteenth century. Fewer people keep it going, and fewer still are really interesting to bear continued reading. This would have been equally true back then, as Mrs Wiggins’ maid-of-all-work would probably have had one where she wrote about William the baker’s son and the village turnip competition. But, as we are all only human, it stands to reason that the squire at the Hall – an eccentric chap who hardly ever wore a wig and kept getting visits from courtiers, musicologists and Frenchmen, and was reputed to have been in love with Mrs Wiggins’ auntie long ago in a wheat field – might have had one too, as a social experiment.
So back in the day I spent that Sunday morning compiling a little list of writers I think would have flocked to blogging as ducks to the Serpentine. It amused me for a while. Partick Kurp has just reminded me of it by posing the same question himself, on Anecdotal Evidence. His list is like mine in that it contains Charles Lamb. He says: “Montaigne, Lamb, Hazlitt, Thoreau, Ruskin, Karl Kraus and Mencken.”
Excellent! But would Thoreau have had to write in an internet cafe?
Kurp goes on:
“Another, less well known, is Peter Altenberg (1859-1919), the Viennese miniaturist championed by Kraus. In 2005, Archipelago Books published Telegrams of the Soul, a selection of his prose translated by Peter Wortsman. Clive James says Altenberg could craft “a world view in two sentences,” and his pieces are always brief, a mélange of essay, fiction, aphorism and feuilleton.”
That’s a marvellous description of blogging, by the way: essay, fiction, aphorism and feuilleton. Really, an excellent description for what I’ve always loved reading. As a child I learned my place int he world early, thinking back on it, with the realisation that I liked going to the “Belles Lettres” section in the bookshop. (They don’t have these any more, sadly: it’s all either memoir or memoir manqué these days.)
My previous post got some very funny comments – though I think my readers were maybe a tad optimistic about the ubiquity of the blogging impulse, especially among people who already have avenues for publication. I can’t really see Lowell having a blog, for example. Or maybe just in his manic phases, and his wife would have had to edit the posts when he went out.
Here’s mine from two years ago:
Charles Lamb YES
Byron YES
Defoe YES
Pound YES YES YES!
Eliot NO
Mary Wollstonecraft YES
Mary Shelley YES but it would have all been about Shelley
Joyce YES
Proust NO
Fanny Burney YES but under a false name
Johnson NO, & then someone would have persuaded him, but it would have been SHORTLIVED
Li Po YES (I’ve taken the word “Western” out of the title as I realised that)
So there you go! And when the conversation dries up over your Sunday roast, or your Spanish omelettes and bloody marys, you can thank me. And come back later and leave a note with your list.










13 Comments
October 12, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Pound would have loved a laptop. Assuming that he could have found a way to cut and paste .pdfs, think how much easier the Cantos would have been to compose. And how much cheaper to produce. Why, we might have had twice as many Cantos, each twice as long, because of all the filler they could easily have incorporated. Why, there might have been Youtube videos of Balinese temple dancers right in the middle of a rant about usury.
What a loss.
October 12, 2008 at 12:37 pm
I think that you should include Nietzsche.
October 12, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Dickens: yes
Whitman: yes
Hardy: no
Larkin: NO!!!
O’Hara: yes
Twain: yes
Marx: yes
Dostoyevsky: yes
Nabokov: no
Brodsky: no
Auden: maybe
Wilde: YES!! (whenever he could find time off from his thrice daily TV show Wilde Life and his various film projects, guest appearances, cameos, etc.)
Re Joyce, I am not sure he would have had a blog as such, but it has often occurred to me how the net would have fascinated him, down to the intricacies of html, Java etc. I am sure he would have made use of it somehow, perhaps producing the first post-modernist online novel. Someone once told me (this is probably apocryphal) that Joyce was planning, for his next book, to write about the sea. The ’sea of information’ would have been the perfect medium.
October 12, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Perhaps blogging existed before computers, just as letter-writing existed before the penny post. Computers just made the whole business more immediate and interactive. I’m thinking of the likes of George Orwell and Samuel Pepys. What could we call them? Loggers?
October 12, 2008 at 7:07 pm
far too busy to thank you for the recurrent stimulusses …
October 13, 2008 at 8:07 am
What a nice way for the recluses to interact! I think Emily Dickenson might have had a blog and E. M. Forster, from the time he never set a foot outside of King’s. And I like to think of Stevie Smith blogging too – she could have been wickedly rude about her mother. You’re probably right that Proust wouldn’t have blogged (Sartre would have, though, my God, and then some) but I have an inkling that he would have been wedded to his mobile phone.
October 13, 2008 at 2:24 pm
If Sartre would have had one, do you think that De Beauvoir would have too? And I’d bet you’d never know she had anything to do with Sartre, if she did.
I don’t think Emily Dickinson would have been a blogger; I always thought of her as being very shy and retiring? Then again perhaps she would have, and had a name that you’d never guess was hers.
Plath – yes!
Ginnie Woolf? yes, but it would be extremely erudite and interesting (bit like MS B?)
EBB… there’s one to consider, would she have written about Browning, though?
George Eliot… a reserved yes.
What about Kerouack and Ginsberg? Yes to the latter, not so sure about the former… which reminds me of…
October 14, 2008 at 12:16 am
Hi Ms B
In answer to Barbara S – I think Kerouac would have been an alpha blogger – a loner and a ranter. What more qualification do you need?
xxx
Pants
October 15, 2008 at 11:45 am
Joseph Roth? YES, I think so…
W.H. Auden NO
George Orwell OBVIOUSLY
Truman Capote YES
October 16, 2008 at 4:07 pm
Actually guys, Clive Davis makes a good point when he remarks that the person who will have the blog is the person who can bring himself to get to grips with all the hyperlinking, comment-moderating, side-bar-fussing, etc, that are what it really entails… I leave it to you to decide if you have read your potential bloggers of the past correctly! (& thanks for the link, Clive…)
October 18, 2008 at 5:13 am
Essay-fiction-aphorism is the total RH.
Blogging shows recluses are not necessarily misanthropes.
Most bloggers put their all into it, nothing left to publish.
I disagree with you about Proust.
October 18, 2008 at 5:22 am
Orwell – Yes. He couldn’t shut up.
October 18, 2008 at 10:04 pm
Gosh, I’ve no idea of Colette would have kept a blog (she may have been rather busy off doing delightful things?) but I’d like to think she might have. And it would have been lovely.
Anais Nin.
All the endless diarists in pre-internet days who weren’t so private about their diaries are would-be bloggers, no?
Perhaps I’m thinking less who -would- have blogged so much as whose blogs I would have liked to have read. I bet Ginsberg’s blog would have been fab.