a good case for religion

rodchenkoredrodchenkobluerodchenkoyellow

I reduced painting to its logical conclusion and exhibited three canvases: red, blue and yellow. I affirmed: it’s all over. Basic colors. Every plane is a plane and there is to be no representation.

Aleksandr Rodchenko

Then there’s this:

From here, Constructivism proceeds to the negation of all art in its entirety, and calls into question the necessity of a specific activity of art as creator of a universal aesthetic.”

Varvara Stepanova: Lecture on Constructivism, 22 December 1921.

In one of the relatively the early rooms of the Tate exhibition Rodchenko and Popova: Defining Constructivism (where the context is provided by quotes from the Great Worker-Overalled One himself) there is a famous text reproduced on the wall, where Rodchenko wrote:

When I look at the number of paintings I have painted, I sometimes wonder what I shall do with them, there are over ten years work in them. But they are as useless as a church. They serve no purpose whatsoever.

Baroque thoughts to follow.

Advertisement

2 Comments

Filed under art

2 Responses to a good case for religion

  1. “I sometimes wonder what I shall do with them”
    As the poet says, you could always hang your trousers over one of them. But was it an El Greco or a Degas? I can’t remember now.

  2. That last quotation is beautiful, Katy. I’m nabbing it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s