When I first got started writing – that is, all my life – I would obsessively read anything a writer had written about writing itself, hoping some transportable truth would reveal itself, something I could take with me. I hoarded copies of the Paris Review interviews, John Gardner’s books on fiction, even a children’s book or two about writing. Most of the time the writers were just talking about themselves, though, of course. How they worked. This in itself was valuable, in that it showed me that each writer is just a person, writing. In my childhood and teens I just wrote, instinctively. I wrote all kinds of stuff. I can remember revising poems at my desk in my room – the big old desk my grandfather had written his sermons on – and not being sure if I was “doing it right,” was there some method considered proper for the revising of a poem, would I even have called it revising? No idea. But I also instinctively knew I was right, was doing it right.
Within that knowledge, that what is right for you isn’t easy for him, and that what works for her is hard for you, it is very valuable to read writer’s accounts of writing. About 15 years ago I got hold of a wonderful little beige post-war book called Writers on Writing, edited by Walter Allen. Its first half is poets – throughout the centuries – on writing poetry, and the second half is novelists on writing fiction. I read it and read it and read it.
I can also heartily recommend Stephen King’s book, On Writing. It comes out of his own practice on teaching and is – aside from the incidental and anecdotal Walter allen book – one of the two best I know. The other one is Anne Lamott’s Bird by Bird. (Her ten-year-old brother, in despair at the kitchen table over an essay assignment, The Birds of America. Her dad: “Just take it bird by bird, buddy. Bird by bird.”) It contains a whole chapter called “The Shitty first Draft” – worth the price of the book for that alone. Just pay no attention at all to those apocryphal stories about how John Updike only ever handed in first drafts and needed no editing! Says who? Oh yeah, sez him!
So at the weekend, the Guardian ran its Ten rules for Writing Fiction, based on Elmore Leonard’s famous ten rules – which includes his famous “Try to leave out the parts that readers tend to skip” – in which many current writers give their own personal ten rules. None of them are quite up to Elizabeth Bowen’s piece in Walter Allen’s book, but then that was pages long, so it was more than just rules. It was technical and brilliant. Some of these are very very good indeed. Add them to the lore!
Most of the rules would, of course, apply equally to writing poetry. Writing is writing. The first and main rule is: “Write for yourself.” If you aren’t delighting yourself, you won’t delight anyone. Or: if you’re bored, imagine us!
Anyway, asked in response to that what my tips on writing poetry would be, I came up with these:
1. Read as widely as you can, & learn from what you don’t like as well as what you do.
2. Try every trick and technique, and find out what works best for you.
3. Be yourself. Writing comes out of the self and the world you’re in.
4. Choose the words that say exactly what you mean – poetry is an art of precision.
5. Remember that a poem is a gift, a work of art, not just ‘self-expression’. Make it as true and tight and beautiful as you can, and send it out there – into the ether, if not the actual world.
6. Keep going. Do it again, and again, and again, and again, and again…
7. Always be open to writing: when the Muse calls, it’s just as well if you’re in.
8. Revise and revise. Learn to tell when the poem’s done. Then stop revising.
9. Don’t take rejection personally. Be ruthless with yourself, always send your best stuff, and keep going.
10. Do it because you love it.
My fellow Salt poet Steven Waling came up with another rule, which I wish I’d thought of: “Stop looking for your voice. It isn’t out there.”







Damn those are fine rules and I agree with you that, writing being writing, they apply to prose as well as poetry. If I had absolutely to choose three of them to live and write by, they would be rules one, four and ten.
Dear Katy
Ten out of ten! I am going to try to copy and paste them! I particularly like rule 7. I seem to have gone from writing a couple of poems a week to a couple per year. However I did manage a short one yesterday. If you’ll indulge me for a moment:
MOON
The moon has a definite face.
Whether he is male or female
Doesn’t matter. She has seen
It all a million times before.
(‘Original Cliches’ Franglo.com Literary section)
Best wishes from Simon
Here’s another couple that have always come in useful to me:
Form is only ever an extension of content. Charles Olson
No ideas but in things. William Carlos Williams.
Dear Katy
My short poem ‘Moon’ is actually in ‘Torn Tickets and Routine Returns’ and not ‘Original Cliches’ as first reported. Apologies for the misinformation. Why do poets always return to writing about the moon? I wonder how many moon poems there are now in the world.
Best wishes from Simon
one addition from me: pay attention. Pay attention to the world around you, to everything you see, hear, taste, smell and read.
“If you’re bored, imagine us!” made me smile. You do that cheeky/funny thing so well.
As for not taking rejection personally…damn that can be hard work! It can sometimes feel so bloody personal (especially taking rule 3 into account…).
x
Pingback: Poetry 101 #2 « altering labyrinth