Schmalz overload in Westminster: three days to go

"Happy days are here again , oh, the skies above are clear again..."

Oh, dear, oh dear oh dear.

So here’s the deal. I went into town this morning. Like you do. The first I noticed of anything was when I came out of Pret and headed across the road. The road in question leads up to the front of Westminster Abbey, which looms over us like a gleaming historical presence every day. I do find it very grounding, and beautiful. (And the clock’s always wrong; I like that.) So today, I notice these big yellow arches on the pavement. They have appeared over the weekend and are – I quickly intuit – security barriers…

The next thing I see is two poor souls in Westminster Council uniforms, yellow and brown (I know – puh-lease), with these pathetic little straw brooms, like what you’d have in your house, and they’re desperately and inadequately sweeping the pavement with them…

Ohdeargod so I hurry past that spectacle and up into a completely deserted office, where I spend half the day writing a lighthearted blog post on “how green is the royal wedding.” I mean, I like kitsch, I have a wide and capacious tolerance for all sorts of things, and I thought it was kind of funny. I did tons and tons of reading.

Well, there you go. I saw a giant press stand up already in front of the Abbey, with journalists all over it, huge microphones and cameras and big black things, and a Japanese couple happily beaming as they spoke into a big fuzzy microphone in the street; I saw those security barriers up close because I went through one of them – they’re not activated yet, obviously. There are two people camping out next to the Abbey already.

My big mistake was forgetting and trying to walk up to Green Park station through the two parks. I hadn’t managed to get out at lunchtime, to speak of, and wanted the walk; but even in St James Park there are giant lights fitted up; it should have been a sign. When you get up to the Mall, enormous flags hanging from the poles, but what really got me was the ropes, the yellow ropes that hang from the poles, with tassels on the ends of them: the golden cords. That bind us to the remnants of the Empire. They are huge. They’re totally out of scale to us, the tiny humans who only walk below, they make us like dolls. All up and down the Mall, as far as you can see.

Well, I’ve seen the pictures of Regent Street. Someone said that “the royal family are masters of iconography,” but if they really were, you’d think they wouldn’t be so thrilled with this:

Regent Street. Just don't mention the War.

Then there’s the sheer size of the flags, and the press stand opposite Buck House, and the huge press enclosure with actual windows (but all built from FSC-certified wood, I can tell you) – and the row of about 20 satellite dishes inside the press area in the park (there will be more like 200), and the massive halogen lights, and the journalists milling, and the man with a very impressive uniform, crossing the street in front of me, actually carrying a whip – and over us looming all these flags, flags and more flags, with their giant yellow cords – the dwarfingness and stultifyingness of every aspect of it. It’s designed to block out all thought.

Of course, it is royal pageantry. It has existed, in whatever form we were capable of, since time immemorial, and its purpose was to intimidate and impress, to dominate. I recently read an incredibly vivid description of Elizabeth I’s coronation at Westminster Abbey. A few years ago, reading another biography by the same author, I read an incredibly vivid description of Eleanor of Aquitaine’s coronation in Westminster Abbey. They dominated with riches beyond compare (Elizabeth wore one of the first pairs of real silk stockings); nowadays, as Orwell predicted, domination comes via media presence, security machines and CSR machinery (they are called The Firm, after all), and, above all, by sentimentality and kitsch.

So, the photos of street parties from the Coronation; instructions on how to make or get some vintage, New Austerity bunting, and pictures of cupcakes; nostalgia crossed with wishful thinking, all those pictures of happy little cross-eyed children of the 1950s eating sandwiches in the street, ah those were the days we were all happier then oh yes we were Mabel… the weird news that Kate Middleton bought three bikinis last week, for her honeymoon. For some reason that really got me. For her sake, too, I mean, but also: I don’t want to know. This is an attempt to turn us all back into children. We’re beyond it, right? I mean, we’re grownups now, we don’t need the royal family to do fun things so we can live vicariously through them, we don’t need them to show us what real living looks like? We’re not as proud of their children as of our own?

There was a big interview in maybe the Telegraph with little Clementine Hambro, the little bridesmaid Diana stopped and spoke to at her own wedding, see above, now 35 and a gardening columnist for The Lady. Oh Peter York, where are you now? This all made sense when I read your column on Sunday. Or maybe it didn’t. Maybe this is me finally getting it.

You wouldn’t mind, and no I really wouldn’t, if there were ANY CONTENT. The spectacle is so devoid of feature, it’s just banal, like death.

And this is just the first proper taste of it we’ve had since Princess Diana died. A little part of me blanched inside when Kate Middleton started flashing that ring around on the engagement day, like seeing a ghost.

Of course I wish them well; they look a lot happier than his parents did, you know, good luck to the kids, I say.

So I was moaning to someone on the phone tonight about all this – while also gradually realising that I think what I’m experiencing may be just the sudden onset of some poorly timed PMT – and I said: “But I usually LIKE kitsch!”

“Yes but this isn’t kitsch,” he replied, “This is a bad joke.”

Advertisement

16 Comments

Filed under England, the Line on Beauty

16 Responses to Schmalz overload in Westminster: three days to go

  1. 1. Her Maj is not responsible for that vile bunting and neither is The Bride or The Groom. One of the moron oiks at Haringay Council probably is.
    2. If the pathetic brooms had been leaf blowers the Greenies would have screamed No ecological! at the Palace.
    3. It is the 2nd Act of the Little Clemmie story that’s funny.
    4. The latest issue of The Lady is beside this laptop now, all the way down here in AUS. I looked for it in the 80′s after Sybil Fawlty mentioned it, and have found it hilarious ever since. Also bought online Rachel Johnson diary of her first year as Editor – doubly hilarious and recommended.
    5. The Bride and Groom really want a quiet ceremony with only nearest and dearest. I like to think they are doing that somewhere right now
    (getting The Emotion out of the way before The Circus), and that they loathe the arch bishop of cant erberry as much as anybody with morals should, and do not want him to be part of those emotions they want to treasure.
    6. I think Clever William bringing out That Ring is just rubbing the faces in it who deserve to be. spectre at the feast, etc. I hope the only thing he has inherited from the Spencer ancestry is physical appearance, and that he has his grandmother’s resolve and morals. Dog and horse breeders know it the grandparents who count.
    7. All the gripers groaners whiners and complainers will be tuned in to their TV sets just the same.
    8. Just as it is vile to ridicule people who are poor or ugly, it is the same for people who are born rich and attractive. Not their fault either.
    9. The Media Is The Enemy. always and totally.

  2. Interesting piece for me, reading in Norway. On Friday I will be watching on TV, along with most of the rest of the world, wishing I was there.

    My main thought will be, however: “I’m grateful that it’s them who have to do this and not me.” Because I think that someone does have to do it.

    As for the Union Jacks, this event seems to me to be a good one to fly them at. There has certainly been worse. Good luck William and Kate.

    P.S. In Norway people love to hang out their Norwegian flags. Many have their own flagpoles to hang them on. They typically raise them on national day (May 17), royal birthdays and family birthdays. Perhaps you have to be invaded to really appreciate why pride in your own national flag is not such a bad thing?

  3. Julie

    Yes, yes, yes, you’re right about all of it. So why do I get a tug in my heart area every time I see that picture of Diana and the little bridesmaid?

  4. Big yellow arches = security barriers? Are you sure it’s not just the official sponsor setting up, Ms B. I hear it’s going to piss down with rain so maybe they could hang some nice yellow tarps from them.

    xxx

    Pants

  5. Ms O’D: #3, yes – I tried to explain this, too, on the phone, and wasn’t even allowed that! It was reassuring that there was someone more dyspeptic than me.

    And #8, also yes – obviously. The timing of all this is interesting to me, there’s a Zeitgeist thing about it – with The King’s Speech – that sits very oddly with the current re-emergence of the class war, the protests, the widespread hatred of the political class and the fact that people are really, starkly losing their jobs right now. It’s as if we are really trying to reassure ourselves somehow that everything is still okay, nothing’s really changed.

    Am I a griper groaner whiner and complainer? I don’t think so… I was assuming I’d probably watch at least part of it, but hoping I’d escape that impulse.

    And yes to the human element, which is real. The two people at the heart of this do look very, very happy, and they’re actually peers, and after the aforementioned one, that’s a relief. The press has been unbelievably depressing with its mutton-dressed-as-lamb stories an about the bride’s mother – just gunning for her, really, in a way her father has totally escaped.

    Then again, Peter York with his soundbite-rich analysis is also the press.

    Ms P, no, they are security things you go through. I’ll get a picture. And that’s a good thing, if you think about it.

    Jonathan, there’s all kinds of stuff at play here, see my above comment – but as to the flag… I was raised in a very flag-waving country, where national identity is ideological, and I have an ingrained horror of it. I’ve never felt that way about the Union Jack until I saw that picture of Regent Street. Anyway, I’m only reporting my immediate experiences and reactions to them, and it was something else being in the Mall yesterday. It did feel like the Heart of the Empire or something. I will walk through there again today and see if it still feels the same.

    I suspect also that the further away you are from this one, the more appealing it is. Norway sounds good. The two inadequately-equipped people frantically sweeping the pavement with their tiny brooms did not make me go all fond and think, “Aww, someone has to do it.” And sure, that comes down to Westminster council, but it wasn’t happy.

  6. Are you sure those yellow arches weren’t from McDonald’s? It sounds appropriate!

    @Ms O’D – if the squabbling Anglo church can’t appreciate Rowan Williams, a good, kind, intelligent man and a fine poet, they could always send him back to us in Wales; we never wanted to lose him to Canterbury in the first place.

  7. Simon R. Gladdish

    Dear Katy

    I am slightly concerned by my utter indifference to the whole business. My general attitude to the royal family is amused tolerance. (Now we’re stuck with the buggers, we might as well keep them.) As a precaution, I’ve imported a crate of Guinness just in case Rusty (far more royalist than I am) forces me to watch it all. Incidentally, compared with a lot of rock stars, Prince William is a relative pauper.

    Best wishes from Simon

  8. Its utterly incomprehensible. The BBC’s obsession with it as well must have been decided on high, it permeates every programme – I’ve had to switch the whole thing off. I was in Finland recently and they were obsessing about it. It’s like when I went to see Gene Wilder in a Neil Simon play in the West End, it exists purely for export, and for television. But you’re spot on when you add that there’s no “content.” This weekend its the Text Festival in Bury, in a week’s time Manchester’s vibrant FutureEverything Festival, regular readings and book launches, Sounds from the Other City – Salford’s small band festival. I’m sure London’s the same, and its like activity has ratcheted up as a reaction to the cuts; as everyone I know who is still in a job, is existentially worried about that job. But lack of “content” is the modern thing isn’t it? I enjoyed the Gormley Fourth Plinth spectacle, but its subject, when all’s said and done, was a celebration (if that’s the word) of banality. It’s David Blaine in his box above the Thames. Empty spectacle, and, nobody’s quite sure why, or who authorises, or who pays.

  9. Tim

    From fifty miles distance this is just another day for which I have to find childcare or, as seems more likely now, take the day off. All the work still to be done and one less day to do it. Still, I’ll try and think of a pleasant way for us to spend the time. Why the selfish pair couldn’t wed on the weekend I don’t know.

    And I most certainly will not be watching on the television – I don’t even know them.

  10. Simon R. Gladdish

    Dear Katy

    The other day I was on Amazon.co.uk checking out Sean O’Brien’s poetry. I noticed to my surprise that his debut novel ‘Afterlife’ was on sale for the princely sum of one penny. I remember the fanfare surrounding the publication of this book and was astonished that a mere year later, it should be so reasonably priced. Naturally I ordered a copy which I am very much looking forward to reading. (The only thing I really like about the British Poetry Establishment is the limitless opportunities it affords for advanced schadenfreude!)

    Best wishes from Simon

  11. Sorry, what are you all talking about?

    Oh, it’s nauseating. I was just subjected to a report of the rehearsal … ‘the bride and groom will be making sure they’re happy with …’. I almost coughed up my dinner.

    I’m not a griper or a moaner, but if it’s shoved down my throat, I gag … I have nothing against the couple, but enough already.

    I’ll be playing cricket on Friday. Anyone fancy a game?

  12. Katy, yes you might well be right about the distance thing :)
    I hope you will be able to write some post-event impressions as well.

  13. Hmmm… no fear, I suspect ;)

  14. You wrote, “I recently read an incredibly vivid description of Elizabeth I’s coronation at Westminster Abbey. A few years ago, reading another biography by the same author, I read an incredibly vivid description of Eleanor of Aquitaine’s coronation in Westminster Abbey. ”

    I’d like to read these biographies. Could I have the author’s name?

  15. Hello, Karen – sorry, I thought they were so ubiquitous it was like dropping some heavy hint… The writer is Alison Weir, who writes incredibly readable, lucid biographies of medieval royalty – especially women, and especially the Tudors, though her Eleanor of Aquitaine is simultaneously inspiring and horrifying, and may be all you’ll ever need to know about the Crusades. She has a very good reputation among the historians I believe, though her books are very accessible and readable (though dense with information). Happy reading!

  16. Okay, well I will then.

    And I second your recommendation of Alison Weir. Brilliant writer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s